/ VPN Security: Are VPNs Safe?
VPN Security: Are VPNs Safe?
Virtual private networks (VPNs) create encrypted tunnels to secure online activity, but their legacy architecture struggles to meet modern security demands. With scalability issues, limited controls, and inherent vulnerabilities, VPNs are increasingly being replaced by zero trust solutions for enterprise security.

How VPNs Work: A Brief Overview
VPNs operate by creating encrypted tunnels between your device and a remote server, shielding your internet traffic from prying eyes. This process, known as VPN tunneling, encapsulates data packets within a secure "tunnel" and protects them using encryption protocols. While this mechanism provides a level of privacy and security over public networks, it has inherent limitations in handling modern demands for scalability and performance. VPNs were originally designed for a time when fewer people required remote access, but their architecture struggles to accommodate the needs of today’s distributed workforces.
At the heart of VPN functionality are the protocols that govern these tunnels. Commonly used protocols include OpenVPN, IKEv2, and IPsec. OpenVPN is known for its flexibility and encryption, while IKEv2 (Internet Key Exchange version 2) maintains stable connections during network changes—such as switching between Wi-Fi and mobile data. IPsec (Internet Protocol Security) provides encryption and authentication protocols designed for secure communication at the network layer. While these protocols aim to secure traffic, their effectiveness is only as strong as the implementation and infrastructure of the VPN service.
By establishing a "virtual" private network across public infrastructure, VPNs allow users to access the internet as though they were operating within a private, secured environment. However, this approach is inherently tied to trust in the VPN provider itself, which can be a critical weak point. Additionally, VPNs rely on perimeter-based security models and broad access, making them increasingly ill-suited for the demands of modern businesses. While they provide basic masking of IP addresses and traffic encryption, they were not designed to scale effectively for large, remote workforces or cloud-first environments.
Key Components of VPN Security
When evaluating the security of a VPN, it’s crucial to understand the core technologies and features that determine its effectiveness. Each component plays a role in protecting sensitive data, but their implementation and reliability can vary significantly across providers.
Data encryption: VPNs rely on encryption standards like AES-256 to scramble data, making it unreadable to unauthorized parties. This level of encryption is considered strong but can be compromised by weak implementation or misconfiguration.
Authentication methods: Strong authentication protocols, such as multifactor authentication (MFA), add an essential layer of security to VPN access. However, not all VPN providers enforce robust authentication, leaving systems vulnerable to unauthorized access.
Kill switch: A kill switch halts internet traffic if the VPN disconnects unexpectedly, preventing unprotected data transmission. This feature is critical to maintaining security but isn't universally implemented or reliable across all VPN services.
Leak protection: DNS, IP, and WebRTC leak protection ensures that users' real identities and locations are not inadvertently exposed. Without these safeguards, even a secure VPN connection can fail to protect sensitive data.
Logging policies: A strict no-log policy ensures that VPN providers do not store records of user activity. Without this assurance, user data could become accessible to third parties, undermining privacy and security.
While these components are foundational to VPN security, their effectiveness depends heavily on the provider's infrastructure, policies, and implementation. In modern cybersecurity, VPNs often fall short of addressing the granular access controls and scalability required for today’s remote work and cloud-focused environments.
Common VPN Security Threats
VPNs are often marketed as a secure solution for online privacy and data protection, but they are not without vulnerabilities. Understanding these common threats is essential for evaluating their limitations in protecting sensitive information.
Man-in-the-Middle (MiTM) attacks: Poorly configured or insecure VPN connections can expose users to MiTM attacks, where an attacker intercepts and potentially alters communications between two parties. Inadequate encryption or authentication can leave users vulnerable, making VPNs ineffective in mitigating such risks.
Data leakage: VPNs are designed to mask IP addresses and encrypt traffic, but vulnerabilities like IP or DNS leaks can expose user information. These leaks can result from software misconfigurations or poorly implemented VPN infrastructure, undermining the privacy VPNs aim to provide.
Malware risks with free VPNs: Free VPNs often monetize their services in questionable ways, embedding malware or tracking software to harvest user data. This compromises user privacy and can lead to broader cybersecurity risks, such as ransomware infections or data breaches.
Credential theft: VPNs are only as secure as the credentials used to access them. Weak or reused passwords, combined with phishing threats, can lead to stolen VPN credentials. Attackers who gain access to a VPN account can exploit it to infiltrate sensitive systems.
These vulnerabilities highlight the limitations of VPNs in providing comprehensive security. Organizations relying on VPNs for remote access should consider alternative solutions that address modern security challenges.
Are VPNs Enough for Enterprise Security?
As enterprises shift to support remote workforces and cloud-first environments, the limitations of traditional VPNs are becoming increasingly apparent. While VPNs were once a cornerstone for securing remote access, they were designed for a time when fewer people needed such connectivity. By design, VPNs lack the flexibility, scalability, and granular controls required for modern enterprise security.
Limitations of VPNs
Scalability challenges: VPNs struggle to scale effectively with the growing demands of remote workforces. Expanding VPN infrastructure to accommodate more users often requires significant resources and can result in performance bottlenecks.
Speed reduction: VPN connections frequently introduce latency, particularly when users connect to geographically distant servers or when many users are on the network simultaneously. This can hinder productivity and degrade the user experience.
Perimeter-based security: VPNs rely on a perimeter-based security model, which grants broad access to internal resources once authenticated. This outdated approach leaves enterprises vulnerable to insider threats, credential theft, and lateral movement across the network.
Lack of granular access control: VPNs typically cannot enforce least-privilege principles or segment access based on user roles or device posture, making it difficult to align with modern security best practices.
Potential for logging: Depending on the VPN provider, user activity may be logged, posing privacy and compliance risks. This undermines the very security and anonymity VPNs are supposed to provide.
Why Is Zero Trust Better Than VPN?
Zero trust network access (ZTNA) offers a scalable, modern alternative to traditional VPNs. Unlike perimeter-based VPNs, zero trust operates on the principle of "never trust, always verify," providing secure, application-specific access instead of broad network-level access.
Granular access control: ZTNA ensures users are granted access only to specific resources based on identity, device posture, and contextual risk, eliminating the broad access inherent in VPNs.
Scalability and performance: Zero trust solutions provide secure, direct access to resources without backhauling traffic through a VPN or data center, improving performance and scalability.
Integrated threat protection: Modern zero trust platforms integrate features like malware inspection, data loss prevention, and traffic analysis, addressing threats VPNs cannot mitigate effectively.
Cost-effective and cloud native: Zero trust architectures are inherently more scalable and cost-efficient, simplifying management and reducing IT overhead compared to VPN infrastructures.
By replacing legacy VPNs with zero trust architectures, organizations can enhance security, improve user experience, and better align with the demands of a distributed workforce. Solutions like Zscaler's Zero Trust Exchange platform are leading the way in enabling secure, seamless access for modern enterprises.
Zero Trust vs. VPN
While VPNs have long been the go-to solution for remote access, their limitations in scalability, security, and performance have made them less suitable in today’s dynamic, cloud-first environments. Zero trust offers a modern alternative, addressing these shortcomings with a focus on granular, application-specific access and advanced threat protection.
VPN
Zero Trust
Access Model
Broad, network-level access
Granular, application-specific access
Security Approach
Perimeter-based, "trust but verify"
Identity-driven, "never trust, always verify"
Scalability
Struggles with remote workforce demands
Cloud native, easily scalable
Performance
Latency due to backhauling traffic
Direct-to-resource for low-latency access
Threat Protection
Limited, reactive measures
Integrated, proactive threat detection
Management Complexity
High, with significant IT overhead
Simplified, policy-driven access management
A cloud-delivered zero trust platform is essential for organizations aiming to secure their distributed workforce while maintaining performance and scalability. By eliminating the vulnerabilities of VPNs, zero trust empowers businesses to reduce risks and align with modern security best practices—setting the stage for platforms like Zscaler to lead.
Zscaler: A Leader in Zero Trust Transformation
Zscaler is at the forefront of the transition from traditional VPNs to modern, secure ZTNA. Unlike legacy VPNs that grant broad, network-level access, Zscaler provides application-specific connectivity, ensuring users are connected to the apps they need—never the network itself. This reduces the attack surface, eliminates lateral threat movement, and empowers organizations to deliver seamless, high-performance access for their hybrid workforce. With its cloud native Zero Trust Exchange platform, Zscaler continues to redefine security for today’s distributed environments.
Enhanced security: Zscaler eliminates exposed IP addresses and minimizes the risk of ransomware, DDoS, and data breaches through AI-powered segmentation.
Superior performance: Users access applications through the closest of 160+ global points of presence, avoiding latency caused by backhauled traffic.
Simplified management: Zscaler reduces IT overhead by replacing complex VPN infrastructure with unified, policy-driven access controls.
Comprehensive protection: The platform integrates advanced threat prevention, data protection, and deception technology to safeguard private application data.
By replacing legacy VPNs with a zero trust architecture, Zscaler empowers organizations to reduce business risk while enhancing user productivity. As a recognized leader in zero trust innovation, Zscaler continues to enable secure digital transformation for businesses worldwide.